Richard Siken, Crush (Yale University
Press, 2005), pbk, 80pp., $14.95.
In Personism: a Manifesto, Frank OHara
declares, Nobody should experience anything they dont need to, and if they
dont need poetry bully for them. I like the movies too. And after all, only Whitman
and Crane and Williams, of the American poets, are better than the movies. Whether
or not OHaras tongue-in-cheek assessment is accurate or inclusive, Id
add Richard Siken to the list. His work is, for my money, much better than the movies.
Im not just saying this because of his use of arresting visual imagery, or his
appropriation of cinematic language and technique as in Dirty Valentine, where
he writes, Were filming the movie called Planet of Love[
] Theres a part
in the movie / where you can see right through the acting, / where you can tell that
Im about to burst into tears, / right before I burst into tears / and flee to the
slimy moonlit riverbed / canopied with devastated clouds. Im saying this because virtually every poem
in Crush is every bit as immediate, engaging,
and absorptive as the best films; he holds the reader rapt, making it almost impossible to
look away from the beautiful and troubling scenes he sets.
Chosen by former US Poet Laureate Louise Glück as the winner of the 2004 Yale Series of
Younger Poets competition, Crush consistently
uses filmic metaphor and genre elements to create fresh poems of love, obsession, sex,
pain, and anxiety. There are elements of the cowboy movieIts a Western,
/ Henry. Its a downright shoot-em-up. Weve made a graveyard / out of the bone
white scenarioand elements of the noir,
as in Little Beast, in which the hardboiled speaker proclaims, But damn
if there isnt anything sexier / than a slender boy with a handgun / a fast car, a
bottle of pills. There are the desolate landscapes and sweeping vistas of the road
movieIt was night for many miles
And there, in the distance, not the
promised land, / but a Holiday Inn, / with bougainvillea growing through chain link by the
pooland the far-flung feats of the action flick: Im battling
monsters, Im pulling you out of burning buildings. And, of course, there are
comings of age:
The blond boy in the red trunks is holding your head underwater
because he is trying to kill you,
and you deserve it, you do, and you know this
and you are ready to die in this swimming pool
because you wanted to touch his hands and lips and this means
your life is over anyway.
That said, cinematic as Sikens poems are, so too are they much more. Although they
are filmic and lovely to picture, his poetry is far from superficial or exclusively
visual, hardly as dependent on pretty surfaces as many films ultimately reveal themselves
to be. Unlike many admittedly enjoyable movies that you can see once and be satisfied,
Sikens work continues to yield long after the initial encounter. He deals deeply
with concerns that at first seem opposite, but which eventually prove themselves to be
inextricably intertwined: hope and despair, eros and thanatos, love and hate, resentment
and forgiveness, pleasure and pain. In playing with these interconnected concepts, he
plays with the readers expectations, as when he writes We clutch our bellies and roll on the floor
/
When I say this, it should mean laughter / not poison.
Siken is a master at giving concrete bodies to ethereal abstractions, and although it
would be fair to say that Crush is a rather dark
collection, so too is it punctuated by moments of beauty and humorbeauty, as when he
writes of how we rolled up the carpet so we could dance, and the days / were bright
red, and every time we kissed there was another apple / to slice into pieces, and
humor, as when he describes the dream scenario:
We were in the Safeway parking
lot. I couldnt find my cigarettes.
You said Hurry up! but I was worried
there would be a holdup
and we would be stuck in a hostage situation, hiding behind
the frozen meats, with nothing to smoke for hours.
You said Dont be silly,
so I followed you into the store.
We were thumping the melons when I heard somebody say Nobody move!
I leaned over and whispered in your ear I told you
so.
In true
Siken fashion, he follows this whimsy up by confessing, These are the dreams we
should be having. I shouldnt have to / clean them up like this.
In short, Sikens breathtaking debut possesses all the ingredients of poet Charles
Harper Webbs formula for great poetry: wit, passion, and impropriety. Through his
powerful use of the second person, Siken reaches out to you, the reader, pulls you into
his picture show, makes you the reluctant star. By the end of the collection, you are left
feeling implicated, participatory. As when he writes, And the part where I push you
/ flush against the wall and every part of your body rubs against the bricks, / shut up /
Im getting to it, he roughs you up, makes you imagine yourself involved. And
you want it. You like it. Youre left wanting more.
Kathleen Rooney
|